Jump to content

Cubey

Civilian
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Cubey last won the day on August 24 2023

Cubey had the most liked content!

Special Fields

  • Weapon of Choice
    Fist

Recent Profile Visitors

1,379 profile views

Cubey's Achievements

Forum Greenhorn

Forum Greenhorn (6/91)

8

Reputation

  1. We love you Zorro. Happy birthday. 

     

    1. zorromafioso

      zorromafioso

      THANK YOU !!!!!

      • 1
      • Upvote
  2. Here is a video from FOX. Look at the first 5 minutes of the interview. That is the single best summary that I have seen of the entire situation so far. The sanctions, and supplying the Ukrainians with arms, is a disaster waiting to escalate into a much larger disaster. The emotional side says to sanction, give Ukrainians arms, engage with Russia, ect, but the rational side will recognize the problems with this approach. Putin is a tyrant, and he cannot be changed, we are not evil, and we can choose the best policies, therefore to prevent further damage we need to focus on what we can do. Ironically, (but not really ironically, since this is the solution in most cases), is to do nothing at all. The war is an escalation on the borders Putin that has been ongoing for a long time. Whether he is justified/unjustified is irrelevant, those are his motives, and if we understand the motives of our enemy correctly, then we can do the absolute best policy. Which is nothing.
  3. Name: mxdzyy Steam I.D: STEAM_0:1:174760792 Reasons for the Ban: Intentional teamkilling after getting rekt. Recommended duration of ban: Unknown Demo Provided?: I could provide a demo but this screenshot should be good enough. As you can see I killed him 6 times in a row. Then he switches over to my team and kills me twice. And then twice more (I was trying to avoid him so I was able to extend my lifespan). Then he leaves the server when I notified an Admin.
  4. Let me begin by saying that I believe this forum post is within the rules of the forum. The Discord group below is not a Clan, nor does it recruit any members away from your unit. Please let me know if it is against the rules. None of this will be mentioned on the server itself as explained to me previously. --- I am going to be running a Draft that will last for 5 Weeks. It will start on Saturdays + Sundays at 8pm EST. Everyone here who enjoys DOD is invited to participate. You can win prizes at the end. The top 5 players at the end of the draft will win prizes. Do not worry you do not need to be the best in the game to win prizes. The draft system is intentionally set up in a way to give everyone almost equal chances to win. If you are interested in participating you can join the following discord. https://discord.gg/FupvmfAr
  5. First let me say that I am not sure if this is against the rules. I know that recruiting is strictly prohibited on the server. However, this is not the server, not am I "recruiting" anyone into any group. I am simply inviting people into competitive 6 vs 6 play. Furthermore, I have checked the rules here, and there is no indication that I am violating server rules. I can help you get set up, show you how to play, and help put you on a team. Joining is completely free. If this topic is forbidden to discuss then may an admin delete it. Otherwise if this topic is allowed on the forum, and you are interested, you can add me me here. My question is, would it be possible to pay for some kind of advertisement so that your server members know? Anyone who plays on your server is invited to join. Bonus: There is a good chance that prizes will be awarded! If you are worried that, "I am new to this, I have no chance to win anything against more experienced players", then the way the system is set up is to allow anyone to win in the end. At the moment there is no prize system but in the past less experienced players have won prizes. Thank you very much, and may Reason bless you,
  6. Name: ()()SKYLINE()() and pwc-doctora Steam I.D: STEAM_0:1:14526255 and STEAM_0:0:109408057 Duration of Ban: Permanent for both accounts. Reasons for the Ban: Aimbot. More specifically, illegal eye-angle violation. Evidence will be provided below. Demo Provided?: This is not necessary. There is a Day of Defeat Source server plug-in called "Easy Anti-Cheat" is is an updated version of "Kigen's Anti-Cheat". It is a simple plugin that is able to test to see if there are any sudden snaps of the crosshair. Your server does not use this plugin. However, 6th RB server does. Yes, I know the 6th RB server is horrendously managed, however, this is an automated system and it works remarkably well. You can find that pwc-doctora was banned automatically by this anti-cheat plugin on 6th RB. SKYLINE is the same player. A simple IP check will reveal they are both from the same location. Furthermore, and even better evidence, SKYLINE has one friend on his steam page, and without any surprise this is pwc-doctora. Comments: I know that admins often like demos for their archives out of procedure. There is no question that this player is using an aimbot. At the moment this cheater is not playing. Perhaps, some admin would be able to spec for a minute or two in spec and confirm themselves that there is sudden snapping.
  7. Name: eat my rocket Steam I.D: STEAM_0:0:14185343 GameMe Page: http://gm.1stmarineraiders.com/playerinfo/171372 Duration of Ban: Permanent Reasons for the Ban: Wallhack + Aimbot. Demo Provided?: There is one demo provided in the attached in this post. Comments: Even though I do believe the player is using a wallhack, there is far better evidence for the aimbot. It can easily be seen in a short demo file. Please look at rocket7.dem file. Go to tick 1300. It is very important to reduce the playback speed to 10%. You can see in slow-motion that at tick 1480 there is no recoil after that one bullet headshot is fired! At tick 1550, the cheater misses the shot but the gun snaps immediately unto the target! At tick 1680 it appears the aimbot malfunctions, get off target, and then immediately snaps onto the target. Note how fast this aimbot snaps. In slow motion players do not move their mouse this fast. rocket7.dem
  8. Name: Hello there Steam I.D: STEAM_0:0:24660925 Game-Me Page: gm.1stmarineraiders.com/playerinfo/173828 Duration of Ban: Permanent Reasons for the Ban: Aimbot + Anti-Recoil Cheat. Demo Provided?: Yes, two demos are provided, but I have many more demos if the admin requests. I have posted both links and attached the files to make it as convenient as possible. http://www.filedropper.com/cheat1 http://www.filedropper.com/cheat11 Comments: Player is using an aimbot that snaps to targets and eliminates cone-of-spread for weapons. The proof is in the demo files. Very important: Make sure to reduce playback speed to 15%! cheat1.dem - Tick 2300, watch in slow motion how the cheater misses the shot, but it automatically snaps onto the target. Tick 2700, player again misses the shot but the garand instantly snaps onto the target. cheat11.dem - Tick 1350, in slow motion cheater misses the shot, but both bullets connect onto the target. It only took him 2 bullets from the support to kill the target despite missing it. Tick 2500, two enemies are approaching, but the bot-program gets confused and snaps between two enemies. You can see how quickly it snaps between targets. Also notice how there is no recoil at Tick 2600, the bullets go directly into the target. cheat1.dem cheat11.dem
  9. Mr. Samuels Since you take a lot of time to respond back perhaps it would be better to continue this in discord/teamspeak? I am sure you had a lot of stuff you wanted to say that you could not because of text limination. Usually people avoid audio discussion because of time constraints, but in your case you indicate you are willing to put in time into the conversation. An direct conservation also avoids people of mis-representating each other views, which we have to a degree in any back-and-forth-conversation. Currently, I am not working until the end of January so I can committ to whatever time you decide. Anyone else who wishes to join the conversation can listen or contribute. Let us make this thread great again. If, however, you choose to decline, then I will spend time writing out a response back.
  10. I am responding to Samuels. First, I need to get to the censorship part immediately because that is by far the most important part. Let me begin by saying is that I do not think you are a "avid supporter of the 1st Amendment", every single person that I come across, tells me how much they support free speech, but when it comes to actual issues that happen in the real world, you see people cave and demand a censor. I think you are doing the same thing and I will explain so in the paragraphs below. In the earlier paragraph you said, "Propagating false, misleading, and inflammatory information", and by your tone, and you can correct me if I am wrong here, from your tone it sounds like you are supporting the Twitter censorship that took place right now. A true advocate of free-expression-of-ideas, somebody like myself, does not censor just because somebody posts false information, or inflammatory information. Trump is the president of the US, he is supposed to represent the views of his followers, and you do not get to censor that just because you do not like that. The whole point of free speech means that offensive and false speech gets said from time to time. You cannot tell me that "this is okay to say, but I determined this is wrong and I will censor you". The moment you do that you want a body to decide what information goes around. And thus you do not support free speech. I get the impression that you are also a Dem supporter, but sadly, like most Dem supporters I come across, you are not in favor of free speech, you want censorship. Just because you personally allow more things to be said than the more radical Dems does not mean you are one of the free speech types. Your earlier comment about hate speech is incorrect. There are no hate speech laws in the US, at least not yet. Members of the KKK can rally together. There is no law against that. There are hate crimes laws that add extra sentencing for somebody already doing a crime but no hate speech laws by themselves. But do not worry. This will change. With the Dem Party, the one True Party, all dissidents will be targetted as hate speech speakers and sent to prison, as happened countless times in history. It is just a vague label that gets assigned to anyone against your party. As I am writing this Trump has been permanently banned from Twitter, it happened much sooner than expected. On top of it, alternative media platforms are being banned from Google sharing. Some Dems are now calling for utility companies to ban cable news from airing from television. Exactly as I predicted the Dem party is the pro-Censorship party and more moderate Dems are being sucked into a cult of hate-Trump and go along with all the terrible censorship (or at least turn a blind eye to it). What you are doing, and this is what many more moderate Dems do, and you can correct me if I am mis-representing your views here, is coping. Coping with that their party is hardcore pro-Censorship. So what more moderate Dems is say something like, "Trump is a terrorist, he needs to be banned, he is calling for violence, that is messed up". Okay, even assuming that is true (it is not), what does his censorship have anything to do with the Censorship proposals against Fox, NewsMax, and OAN? What does his Censorship have anything to do with Google banning alternative media platforms from their services? What does his Censorship have anything to do with banning an intelligence scientist from various platforms? It is coping. Coping that the Dem party are the "good guys". The Dem party are not the good guys. Most individual members of the Dem party are good guys, but they sadly stuck in a cult and end up doing, or at least going along with, terrible things their Party does and are afraid to speak up (party because they are afraid to get censored themselves). For instance, how many Dems were speaking up strongly against the violence back in June, or speaking up against the Censorship? Very few. Most are scared to be censored and cope by saying "but Trump is the bad guy", and their Party keeps on doing terrible things. What ever happened to the idea: I may not agree with what you have to say but I will give up my life to defend your right to say it?
  11. My point was that the media representation of the Trump protests were completely different from their coverage of the Bureau of Land Management protests. When for months and months the news anchors were either condoning or explaining those protests and telling their viewers "this is a small group of people, ect". But with the Trump protests they immediately said this was a terrorist act, that Trump is responsible, and his supporters are to take blame for all of this, they immediately censored him (a taste of the censorship which is to come from the Dem party) from his account, some even called for the removal of all Rep party members. I remember when some guy, in Wisconsin, was shot by the police, because he physically assaulted his former wife, and kidnapped her children, violated a restraining order, and was fleeing from the police when they were ordering him to stand down, while reaching for a weapon, the news media conveniently ignored all of those crucial facts and simply reported "man shot in the back by police". After the protests started, the news media, yet again, was reporting that these were mostly peaceful protests that were completely justified and even Kalama traveled there, while pretending to care, in order to interview the shot man (as a publicity stunt for herself). Any news organization that blatantly omits all of this information is a fake news organization that spreads lies to divide people. The worst part of all, and this is why I call it the cult-of-the-Dem-party, and why not the same title for the Rep party, is that Dem party members had an extremely hard time to condemn the violent protests. A surefire way to know if someone is in a cult is by showing them an act of violence and asking them if they condemn it. When someone starts to hesitate, or rationalize, pause at the question, then they are in a cult. They realize something is wrong, but cannot leave the cult and need a way to reconcile. Compare the Trump protests with how the conservative biased media handled it. All main conservatives shows that I seen, maybe there are exceptions that I do not know of, all of them immediately condemned it and said that is not how civilized people act. Notice that big difference. The CNN (fake news) anchors cannot condemn that Land Management protests, including Dem party members, but when I talk with Rep party members, none of them that I talk with hesitate to condemn the actions. Furthermore, the Land Management protests were attacking civilians. Burning down civilian houses, cars, bystanders, ect. You seen videos of them attacking people in restaurants. All over the country, for months. What did the Trump protesters do? They stormed the Capitol, not some innocent civilians, for 'just' a single day. Is the damage in any way comparable? Both of acts of violence but attacking innocent civilians that have nothing to do with your problems is far worse. And yet the fake news media never condemned the violence being done to innocent civilians. This is why the news coverage of Trump and the protests have been completely dishonest. Here is the problem with what you said, and I am saying you are doing this, but I have dealt with this and seen it happen countless times. When people are pro-censorship, and again I am not saying you are, but in general, they say "just do not say bigoted stuff on our servers". If I write, 'Bureau of Land Management', they will ban me, and tell me that, because I did not refer to the movement by their self-described name I am clearly a white nationalist that needs to be censored. That is pretty messed up vague censor because they decide what is "bigoted" and then apply it for anyone who challenges their views. This is just something I dealt with a lot and seen people deal with a lot (for instance, I seen entire channels purged from existence, without warning, for simply having Charles Murray, who is an intelligence researcher, get completely banned, for simply having a scientist discuss his research the strongly challenges the Dem-cult belief.) I think Trump did actually unify a lot of people together. He did cause great hatred towards him and his movement coming from the Dem party. But that is where the media comes in. If the media was honest and fair then Trump would not have any level of hatred he has today. Trump made massive improvements in every single demographic since his first election. I seen rallies of his where Amish people were showing up, Hasidic Jews were showing up, ect. I seen Trump rallies across the world, such as 'Make Honk Kong Great Again', ect. He was nominated for 4 Nobel peace prizes. He stopped wars from taking place. The first president to not start a new war since WW2. Trump is not a good person. But in some bizarre and comical way he did what you said. He was the first "president of the people" that the US had in a very long time. Not part of any establishment, and all the love he had, was from the people, not from the elites. But much of this what I say is not understood about Trump because the media is truly making people turn on him and think he is the most evil man ever. For the longest time people were saying, "there needs to be a people's president". And he was one. Very imperfect, with a ton of problems, but he was that guy. So I disagree with you. He was not a serious candidate, he was a joke candidate, but somehow he did actually bring many people together, including people around the world.
  12. I do not know what kind of rules this forum has. There is a lot of mass censorship these days so I do not know what you censor on your forums. If you want to discuss this with me further, you can add me on steam, and we can discuss it in a lot of detail. That includes anyone else on this forum. Interesting story, there is a member of your community, who had me added on steam, and he was discussing Trump with me. After I corrected a lot of his false information about Trump, and he ran out of responses back to me, he just said "you are a racist" (the usual response), ran away from the conversation, and blocked me. It is really sad to see people this closed-minded who cannot be willing to get challenged. I will just say that there is a tremendous amount of false information by the media around Trump and this incident. I will not say more because I am worried this forum will censor me (sad days we are living in). So all I am going to say is, there is a lot of false information about Trump, and blaming it on him, and what he is and is not responsible for. Back in June, there was a lot of protests by a certain group (which I will not say the name of because of censorship reasons). During those months many people died. That group was a wing of the Dem party. The people of the Dem party did not condemn the violence. I seen main media platforms have professors on their show that outright argued on live TV that "property damage is not violence". I seen anchors on live TV media argue that "who says that protests need to be peaceful?". I seen Dem party members continually dodge the question of violence being done by this group. The media kept on saying how the protests were "mostly peaceful" despite burning buildings, and dead people, ect, and they kept on telling how how the group is not responsible for this. But now, they did a complete 180 degree turn, and everything they been saying for months is not the opposite. This is propaganda at its finest. I disagree with this statement. This, and I am not exaggerating, is the end of America. The reason is very simple. Never before in American history have I heard party members calling for censorship laws and "truth committees" that you have in authoritarian countries. Some American people dislike Trump so much that they rather see the most sacred Amendment, the first Amendment, be completely destroyed, and side with the party of Censorship and the party that openly called for laws for the persecution of dissidents, than to see Trump be re-elected. It is not about Trump being re-elected or not that is the problem. It is the problem that the Dem party turned in the party of pro-censorship, and they will go after their opponents from this day forward. Here are the exact steps that will happen in the days that follow. First, Trump will be banned from twitter. Second, Dem party will call for the persecution of Trump and attempt to imprison him. Third, the Party will eliminate the Electoral College, eliminate the Supreme Court, and possibly eliminate the Senate (they all openly mentioned this many times). Fourth, the Party will possibly add new states to the US which will definitely vote in favor of their Party. Fifth, the Party will pass "hate speech laws" which, in actuality, will persecute anyone who speaks up against the party. Sixth, the Party will seek to pass laws controlling information on the internet and what people get to see. Seventh, the Party will pass "anti hate laws" which will put people in prison which are dissents of their cause. Eigth, the Party will entirely abolish the US Constitution under the pretense that it is a "racist document", the Bill of Rights will be removed, and they will install a "Social Constitution" which will only be filled with their Party values. None of this is going to happen in just 2 years, or 4 years, this will happen possibly over 10 to 20 years. But it will happen because from this point one it will be one-Party one-Rule coming forward, permanently. I hope I am wrong. I hope that in a few years we can all read this post and say "Wow, you are so wrong, you cannot possibly have been any wronger". I pray to Science that I am wrong. But all my observations lead to this conclusion. Another possibility is that the United States will secede. Once it becomes clear that the Party is a permanent Party and they are in favor of all those policies that I described above, then some of the non-cult states will secede. The question is whether the Party will go to war with those states, that issue I do not have a prediction on.
  13. I was wondering if I am allowed to change my username to MAGA. I never type in the server anyway and just play. I play on the server all the time and never cause issues. I just play.
  14. I looked at the server rules and I did not see any rules about having "MAGA" as your username as you play on the server. Would somebody be able to confirm that such a name is allowed on the server?
×
×
  • Create New...