Jump to content

6÷2(1+2) = ??  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. What's the answer?

    • 1
      24
    • 9
      24


Recommended Posts

Posted
IT depends how you write it:

MATH.png

The way Kaba wrote the question, the answer would be 1.

OMG ty parker. It all depends on how you write it out. IF this question was in a text book it would not be written that way. They would write it in a way with parenthesis so that there can only one answer. but great topic kaba, everyone started to debate just like at yo skoo.

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
^ what are doing ?

fyi I input this in Wolfram Alpha i got 9. Check your self here

Hey man, I'm just trying new things unlike my sexuality because I only like women so don't even joke about that so yeah in my mind it's 7 so let's just leave it at that so I don't get embarrassed. Completely logical and grammatically, punctually correct post.

Posted

I think that some people here are misunderstanding how the parentheses rule works. It isn't that the parts "near" the parentheses are done first, it's the contents of the parentheses.

Based on the left to right rule for equally ranked operations the answer has to be 9, as parker's second drawing shows. In order to write the problem such that the answer is 1 you would require a second set of parentheses to reverse the order of the division and multiplication operations. writing

6

------

2(1+2)

implies that the problem is 6/(2(1+2)) not 6/2(1+2)

without those extra parentheses it would be

6

-- (1+2)

2

Posted

Very basic math lol.. and what parker said is completely right lol

I think Kirk is....approving Logsdon's post?? In not sure here

i think kirk is giving logsdon the "holy fuck you really are retarded look" lol thats not an approval of any kind...

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
...Mind fuck?!??? But yeah, I think they're in different modes.

ive actually seen and did a little research on this and the basic reason this argument exists has to do with when the calculators were programmed and the functions that were used in the coding practice. The calculator on the right came on the market before the one on the right. It was noticed by collegiate professors (sry i forgot where exactly :( ) and wrote a letter of importance concerning this important issue. The calculator on the left was later released with the updated program which included the "BEDMAS" code as many of us know it today.

tl;dr: calculator on right doesn't have "BEDMAS" programmed into it, the one on the right does making it correct.

Posted
ive actually seen and did a little research on this and the basic reason this argument exists has to do with when the calculators were programmed and the functions that were used in the coding practice. The calculator on the right came on the market before the one on the right. It was noticed by collegiate professors (sry i forgot where exactly :( ) and wrote a letter of importance concerning this important issue. The calculator on the left was later released with the updated program which included the "BEDMAS" code as many of us know it today.

tl;dr: calculator on right doesn't have "BEDMAS" programmed into it, the one on the right does making it correct.

I'm sorry but, which is which? haha

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Recent Posts

    • Name: XXTEHHAXOR1337XX   Steam I.D: STEAM_0:0:60869150   Duration of Ban: Permanent   Reasons for the Ban: Aimbot   Demo Provided?: Y   Comments: Demo is short, but long enough... haxor.dem
    • Name: ††† Amputator †††   Steam I.D: STEAM_0:1:924596787   Duration of Ban: Permanent   Reasons for the Ban: Anti-Recoil Hack   Demo Provided?: Y   Comments: Looks like wall-hack too, but he's been leaving when I spec him, so I just took the obvious one. amputator.dem amputat.dem
    • 2nd Platoon Weekly Attendance   Week of 23MAR2025   P = Present | E = Excused | A = Absent   Platoon Staff CWO. A. Pitteway - Excused 1stSgt. J. Candy -  Present GySgt. A Yoder -  Present GySgt. R. Fielding - Excused   1st Squad Squad leader:  Cpl. M. Noel - Excused Cpl. B. Grande -  Present Cpl. R. Smith -  Present Cpl. C. Keebler - Present Pfc. D. Moffat -  Present     2nd Squad Squad leader:  SSgt. S. Holquist - Excused Cpl. T. Scary -  Present Cpl. C. Marsh -  Present Cpl. W. Swift - - Excused Pfc. M. Oake - Excused Pvt. R. Zera - Absent    
    • 2nd Platoon Weekly Attendance   Week of 16MAR2025   P = Present | E = Excused | A = Absent   Platoon Staff CWO. A. Pitteway - Excused 1stSgt. J. Candy - Excused GySgt. A Yoder - Excused GySgt. R. Fielding - Excused   1st Squad Squad leader:  Cpl. M. Noel - Excused Cpl. B. Grande - Excused Cpl. R. Smith - Excused Cpl. C. Keebler -Excused Pfc. D. Moffat - Excused     2nd Squad Squad leader:  SSgt. S. Holquist - Excused Cpl. T. Scary -Excused Cpl. C. Marsh - Excused Cpl. W. Swift - - Excused Pfc. M. Oake - Excused Pvt. R. Zera - Excused    
×
×
  • Create New...