Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

300H-case-flat-640x389.jpg

CES is about technology of all kinds; while we're busy covering cameras, TVs, and CPUs, there's a huge number of products that fall outside our normal coverage. Austin-based startup TrackingPoint isn't typical Ars fare, but its use of technology to enable getting just the perfect shot was intriguing enough to get me to stop by and take a look at the company's products.

TrackingPoint makes "Precision Guided Firearms, or "PGFs," which are a series of three heavily customized hunting rifles, ranging from a .300 Winchester Magnum with a 22-inch barrel up to a .338 Lapua Magnum with 27-inch barrel, all fitted with advanced computerized scopes that look like something directly out of The Terminator. Indeed, the comparison to that movie is somewhat apt, because looking through the scope of a Precision Guided Firearm presents you with a collection of data points and numbers, all designed to get a bullet directly from point A to point B.

tp-throughscope.png

The PGF isn't just a fancy scope on top of a rifle. All together, the PGF is made up of a firearm, a modified trigger mechanism with variable weighting, the computerized digital tracking scope, and hand-loaded match grade rounds (which you need to purchase from TrackingPoint). This is a little like selling both the razor and the razor blades, but the rounds must be manufactured to tight tolerances since precise guidance of a round to a target by the rifle's computer requires that the round perform within known boundaries.

338T-leftside-quarterfront.jpg

The image displayed on the scope isn't a direct visual, but rather a video image taken through the scope's objective lens. The Linux-powered scope produces a display that looks something like the heads-up display you'd see sitting in the cockpit of a fighter jet, showing the weapon's compass orientation, cant, and incline. To shoot at something, you first "mark" it using a button near the trigger. Marking a target illuminates it with the tracking scope's built-in laser, and the target gains a pip in the scope's display. When a target is marked, the tracking scope takes into account the range of the target, the ambient temperature and humidity, the age of the barrel, and a whole boatload of other parameters. It quickly reorients the display so the crosshairs in the center accurately show where the round will go.

Image recognition routines keep the pip stuck to the marked target in the scope's field of view, and at that point, you squeeze the trigger. This doesn't fire the weapon; rather, the reticle goes from blue to red, and while keeping the trigger held down, you position the reticle over the marked target's pip. As soon as they coincide, the rifle fires.

tp-track.png

TrackingPoint is quick to emphasize the rifle doesn't fire "by itself," but rather the trigger's pull force is dynamically raised to be very high until the reticle and pip coincide, at which point the pull force is reset to its default. In this way, the shooter is still in control of the rifle's firing, and at any point prior to firing you can release the trigger. In the mockups the company had on display for the press to experiment with, the action appeared to be the same—I pulled the trigger and lined up the dots and the blue plastic toy gun went click.

tp-scope.png

Having the round fire when the shot is lined up rather than in immediate response to a trigger pull eliminates a tremendous amount of uncertainty from the shot. Even the most experienced shooters can upset a weapon's aim when pulling the trigger, and overcoming the reflex to twitch or preemptively move against a weapon's recoil is very, very difficult. By allowing the computer to choose the precise moment to take the shot, accuracy is greatly enhanced.

Putting lead accurately on targets is only part of what TrackingPoint's PGF system does. The computerized tracking scope contains some amount of nonvolatile storage, and like an airplane's "black box," it's constantly recording the visual feed from the optics. It also contains a small Wi-Fi server, and TrackingPoint offers an iOS app that connects to the scope via an ad-hoc Wi-Fi network and streams the scope's display to the app, allowing someone with an iPad or iPhone to act as a spotter. TrackingPoint notes that for novice hunters, having the ability to duplicate the scope's picture onto an external display makes it a lot easier for an experienced spotter to give advice on how and when to shoot.

39-iPad-640x360.png

There's a social media aspect, too—the scope's video recordings can be uploaded to video sharing sites like YouTube. Rather than bragging to buddies about that amazing 1000-yard shot you took at the range or out in the field last week, you can simply show them, complete with all the heads-up display data about conditions and range.

TrackingPoint had one actual rifle on display in the press room, along with several mock-ups equipped with iPhones in place of scopes. The iPhones were running a simulated version of the TrackingPoint scope software, letting demo users line up their shots on polygonal deer and hogs in a landscape much like popular hunting video games. It felt a bit like playing with an "easy mode" cheat turned on, though, as it was nearly impossible to miss, even at tremendous distances. TrackingPoint is considering selling the demo software as a standalone hunting app, though from my brief experience with it, there wasn't a whole lot of challenge to felling game once you had the mark-and-fire procedure worked out.

This might not make a compelling video game, but it certainly does make for an accurate weapon system. TrackingPoint says the "first shot success probability"—that is, a shooter's ability to successfully land a round on target in a single try—is drastically increased. The TrackingPoint representatives present brought this up when I commented on the necessity of buying (more expensive) ammunition directly from TrackingPoint rather than buying or loading one's own rounds. TrackingPoint contends the ability to be drastically more precise with aiming means fewer rounds have to be fired for the same effect, ultimately saving money.

tp-fssp.jpg

I asked about potential military applications, since they are obvious, but TrackingPoint was quick to downplay involvement with the Department of Defense. The "connected shooter" goal of the PGF system in many ways lines up with the Army's limping, on-again-off-again Land Warrior program. However, the very nature of the government contract and procurement process ensures that any technology developed for military use must go through an incredibly lengthy and convoluted development process, meeting shifting and sometimes outdated design goals along the way. TrackingPoint said that its goal is to produce the technology first, and then find the market and applications once it actually had something ready to go—and this is what it has done.

The company is also keenly aware of the potential negative public perception right now around firearms and firearm manufactures, in the wake of recent mass-shooting events like the ones in Sandy Hook and Aurora. The three models of PGF are bolt-action hunting rifles, unwieldy for any kind of close-quarters work; the tracking system itself requires patience and care to line up and fire, and it doesn't appear at all to be the kind of thing a mass-shooter would employ. At this time, TrackingPoint indicated that it has no intention of producing a PGF system for anything other than bolt-action rifles.

Hunting is a controversial pastime, but it's an undeniably popular one, and TrackingPoint is dialed in very well at its target market. The price is relatively high—the rifles start at about $17,000 (a price which includes an iPad with the TrackingPoint app pre-configured and ready to go), but that isn't a huge premium over parting together one's own rifle and precision optics.

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/01/170...the-real-world/

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Recent Posts

    • Wow u must’ve made this post when i was high af lmao this was bad 
    • Today is the 4th year anniversary of the original post. Now that much time has passed, we have learned a lot of truth, and we can more accurately discuss this.    The original poster said that the mob killed 4 people. It is understandable to say that on the day it happened, but now that 4 years has passed, the actual number is zero. There were zero people who were killed by the mob. There was only one person who died, who was one of the Trump supporters inside the Capital.    I made two predictions, you can go back to my post and read them again, that Trump would get banned on Twitter and that the Democrats will try to put him in jail. This is indeed what happened. Soon after Trump was banned from Twitter and the Democrat party cheered for this type of censorship. After Elon acquired Twitter and read through the files it was learned that the Twitter employees had debates among themselves about banning Trump as he never called for violence. But they went along with the censorship anyway because they wanted it to happen.    My other prediction was that the Democrats will try to put Trump in jail. They tried. They tried very hard. And I hope they succeed on January 10th, because it would be a hilarious meme at this point and just add to the Trump-aura culture. But the NY case was non-sense, the weakest and most pathetic case of them all. Even Fareed Zakeri, from CNN out of all places, to his credit, acknowledged this case is entirely politically motivated and would never have been brought if the person was other than Trump.     Here is what we do know about January 6th. There were a few thousand people inside the Capital. The overwhelming majority of those people were led in by the police and asked for permission to be inside the Capital. We know this because Tucker Carlson shared the January 6th tapes after the Republicans took control of the House in 2022 midterms. Those people are not the "mob", and they did nothing wrong. The only "mob" was a much smaller group of people fighting with police on the other side of the Capital.   However, the Democrats put everyone in prison. Instead of putting the actual mob into prison, they put every single Trump supporter even if they got consent from the police to come inside. Including the famous mem-Shaman. That guy is seen on video asking police to be inside the Capital, and he is seen on video telling a crowd that he is there for peaceful purposes. The Democrats put everyone in prison, some of those people are still awaiting sentencing, all because of revenge. It was not about justice, but about power and vengeance.    We also now know that the FBI had agents dressed up as Trump supporters in the crowd that day. Some of those agents are caught on video inciting a group of people to violence. Those FBI agents were never charged. Ted Cruz has questioned the FBI director asking her whether any FBI agents were instructed to incite people to commit violence, and she refused to answer.    In 2021 and 2022 the Democrats formed the unSelect Committee to "analyze" what happened on January 6th. That was broadcasted on mainstream news every day. The committee would read Trump's tweets and other messages/conversations. However, they intentionally left out part of the tweets/messages whenever Trump would use the word 'peaceful', clearly this committee was not to establish truth but rather to spread propaganda.    To summarize, here is the truth story of January 6th that we now know. Trump never instructed his supporters to commit any violence. There were over 100,000 supporters that day. Out of those only a few thousand were inside the Capital. The ones who were inside the Capital had permission to be there. The mob of supporters were a far smaller group, at a separate area of the Capital, that acted entirely independently of what everyone else did. The story is far overblown by a corrupt system that desperately wants to hold on to power. This corrupt state has propagandized the events of the day, even using its own FBI agents to incite people to commit violence, because they really wanted something bad to happen to blame it on Trump. The corrupt state was worried that Trump might return again and spread fake news about these events hoping that it will make him lose support. But as time went on, the American people saw the corruption and the lies, and on November 5th of 2024, they elected Trump again by an overwhelming margin of victory that nobody expected, even winning the popular vote. Clearly, the American people do not believe in this and the evil state that tried to hold on to its power has failed their smear campaign.    
    • I was also present. Player was rampant TKing as well.
    • Name: Kirillich Steam I.D: [U:1:1118403282] Reasons for the Ban: hacking Recommended duration of ban: Perm Demo Provided?: Y krillich.dem
    • Name: alien   Steam I.D: STEAM_0:1:98881132   Duration of Ban: Permanent   Reasons for the Ban: Inappropriate Language   Demo Provided?: N   Comments: Made a threat of real life violence in the server. Swift was recording in medal, and captured some of it. I know medal is not a suitable demo source for bans, but in this case I felt it was necessary to log. uncapped_MedalTVDayofDefeatSource20250106164057-tr-edit.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...